Welcome

Ordinals Inscriptions: How Bitcoin NFTs Work and How to Try One with unisat

Okay, so here’s the thing. Bitcoin can carry NFTs — not in the way Ethereum does, but in a very Bitcoin-native way that’s been quietly reshaping how people think about digital ownership on the chain. At first glance it feels counterintuitive. Bitcoin is “just” money, right? But ordinals inscriptions change that assumption, and once you see how they slot data into satoshis, the possibilities (and the headaches) start to make sense.

I’ll be honest: I was skeptical too. My instinct said this was a novelty. Then I watched an inscription propagate across the mempool and actually land on-chain — and something felt off about calling it “just a novelty” after that. This piece walks through the core ideas, practical steps, risks, and how to experiment with inscriptions using the unisat wallet, without pretending it’s foolproof or without downsides.

What are Ordinals and Inscriptions?

Short version: Ordinals are a numbering scheme for individual satoshis. Inscriptions attach arbitrary data (images, text, small programs) directly to those satoshis. The combination makes a satoshi behave like an on-chain collectible — an NFT of sorts — because the data is preserved on Bitcoin’s ledger rather than being pointed to off-chain storage.

On one hand this is elegant: it’s sovereign, censorship-resistant, and leverages Bitcoin’s security. On the other hand, though actually, it’s messier than a typical ERC-721 mint. Fees are paid in BTC, transactions can be larger, and the data stays forever — for better or worse.

Initially I thought adoption would be tiny. But then Ordinals found a niche with artists, collectors, and speculators who prefer Bitcoin’s settlement finality. The ecosystem moved fast, and wallets, explorers, and marketplaces adapted to treat inscriptions like NFTs.

How Inscriptions Work — A Practical Look

Mechanically, an inscription is embedded in a Bitcoin transaction, often as part of the witness data, and attached to the ordinal index of a satoshi. That satoshi carries the content forward as it moves between wallets. The Bitcoin network itself doesn’t care what the data means — it just stores it in blocks — but tools that read ordinals can reconstruct ownership and the content.

There are trade-offs. Storing images or long texts increases transaction size and, therefore, miner fees. Larger inscriptions sometimes get delayed if fee rates spike. Also, because the data is on-chain, mistakes are permanent — no “delete” button. So think twice about what you inscribe.

Why People Use Ordinals (and Why Some Don’t)

Some collectors like the purity: an inscription is secured by Bitcoin’s hashrate. Others are drawn to the novelty and scarcity dynamics — the ordinal number itself can be meaningful. Fee mechanics create a kind of analog to gas dynamics on Ethereum, but with Bitcoin’s settlement model.

Critics point out that heavy use of on-chain data increases block demand and can create congestion. There’s also debate about whether this aligns with Bitcoin’s philosophical focus on money. Those tensions are real and sometimes hotly debated in channels where I hang out — and they should be.

Using unisat to Manage and Inscribe Ordinals

If you want to experiment without running a full node, the unisat wallet is one of the more approachable options. It’s a browser extension wallet that displays ordinals, helps you inspect inscriptions, and connects to services that can create inscriptions for you.

Here’s a general flow when using unisat: first, set up the wallet and secure your seed. Next, fund the wallet with enough BTC to cover the inscription fee (which depends on inscription size and mempool conditions). Then either use built-in tooling or a connected service to craft the inscription payload, preview the resulting transaction, and broadcast when you’re comfortable with the fee estimate.

Quick practical tip: if you’re inscribing an image, compress it. Seriously. Smaller files mean lower fees and a faster confirmation. Also, check how unisat displays metadata — sometimes the rendering differs between explorers, so preview in a couple tools if you care about presentation.

Costs, Confirmations, and Real-World Constraints

Fees are the big variable. A tiny text inscription can be relatively cheap, but a detailed image can run to tens or hundreds of dollars, depending on congestion. Confirmations behave like normal BTC transactions; the usual rule of thumb about waiting for multiple confirmations applies if ownership certainty matters.

Another constraint: compatibility. Not every wallet or marketplace understands ordinals yet. If you plan to move an inscribed satoshi, both sending and receiving tools should be ordinal-aware, or else the recipient might not see the inscription properly. That said, awareness has grown fast — but still, check first.

Risks and Good Practices

Don’t inscribe anything that could get you into trouble. Images or text that violate laws or platform rules — they don’t disappear. And because inscriptions are permanent, mistakes are costly. Use testnet when you can, and send a small “dry-run” inscription before committing serious funds.

Private key hygiene matters even more: if the seed is lost, the inscription is effectively gone even if it remains on-chain. Back up carefully. Also be cautious with third-party inscription services — trust matters, and there have been scams.